Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF Nova Scotia

Citation: Hyson v. Nova Scotia (Public Service LTD), 2016 NSSC 153

Date: 2016-06-16

Docket: Hfx No.  447446

Registry: Halifax

Between:

Annette Louise Hyson

Applicant

v.

Nova Scotia Public Service Long Term Disability Plan Trust Fund

and Dr. Colin F Davey

Respondents

 

Library Heading

 

Judge:

The Honourable Justice James L. Chipman

 

Heard:

April 28, 2016 in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Subject:

Judicial review

Appeal Board’s consideration of extrinsic evidence in denying LTD benefits

Summary:

The Applicant is an employee of the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, insured for long term disability under the Nova Scotia Public Services Long Term Disability Plan.  She applied for LTD benefits and was denied.  The Applicant made further submissions and the denial was maintained.  She appealed and the matter was referred to an Appeal Board.  The Appeal Board conducted its own research and denied the appeal.

 

 

 

Issues:

(1)        Was the Applicant owed procedural fairness?

(2)        Did the Appeal Board’s reliance on outside sources result in a breach of the duty of fairness?

 

Result:

As an administrative decision-maker, the Appeal Board owed Ms. Hyson procedural fairness, which is a sufficient basis for judicial review.  The Appeal Board’s use of independent research, without giving the Applicant an opportunity to respond, violated the duty of fairness.

Procedural fairness is a fundamental tenet of judicial review and should not in any circumstances be ignored.  In this case, it is apparent that the outside research significantly influenced the result.  Accordingly, the decision of the Appeal Board was set aside and Ms. Hyson’s appeal was referred to a newly constituted Appeal Board.

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.