Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

CASE NO.                                                                                                                      VOLUME                                                                                                                                 PAGE

Cite as: Walker v. Allcott, 1997 NSCA 106

 

BRUCE WALKER and                                                                                                                                                                                                                     NATHAN ALLCOTT

MARLENE ELLMAN

                                                                                                                                                     - and -

(Appellants)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        (Respondent)

 

C.A.  No.  134930                                                                                     Halifax, N.S.                                                                                                                    HART, J.A.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

 

 

 

APPEAL HEARD:                                                                                May 22, 1997

 

JUDGMENT DELIVERED:                                                          May 29, 1997

 

SUBJECT:             Residential Tenancies Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 401

Limitation of Actions Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 258

 

SUMMARY:      Section 14 of the Residential Tenancies Act allowed the bringing of an application "not more than one year after the termination of the tenancy". The trial judge held that this limitation could have been extended under s. 3(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act and sent the matter back to the Board for further consideration.  Appeal Court reversed this ruling finding that the type of procedure under s. 14 did not amount to an "action" dealt with under the Limitation of Actions Act.

 

RESULT:                                       Appeal allowed and the decision of the Board restored.

 

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION, QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT FROM THE COVER SHEET.  THE FULL COURT DECISION CONSISTS OF 7 PAGES.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.