Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

                           NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

                       Citation: Shannex Health Care Management Inc. v.

                      Nova Scotia (Department of Health), 2005 NSCA 52

 

                                                                                                     Date: 20050330

                                                                                               Docket: CA 228257

                                                                                                   Registry:  Halifax

 

 

Between:

                                  Shannex Health Care Management Inc.

                                                                                                               Appellant

                                                             v.

 

                           Attorney General of Nova Scotia representing the

                                     Nova Scotia Department of Health

                                                                                                            Respondent

 

                                                             

                                                             

 

 

 

 

 

Judge:                   The Honourable Justice Nancy Bateman

 

Appeal Heard:      March 15, 2005

 

Subject:                Freedom of Information request       

 

Summary:             Shannex, the operator of several provincially licensed nursing homes, objected to the Department of Health’s proposal to release financial information relevant to the calculation of the allowable per diem rate charged by various nursing homes to their provincially subsidized residents.  A Supreme Court judge upheld the Department’s decision to release the information.  The statutory basis of Shannex’s objection was s.21(1)(c)(i) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (“FOIPOP Act”), S.N.S. 1993, c. 5, s. 1.

 


Issues:              Did the Supreme Court judge err in concluding that Shannex had not established that disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to harm significantly the competitive position or interfere significantly with the negotiating position of the third party and/or result in undue financial loss or gain to any person or organization?

 

Result:             Appeal dismissed with costs.  The Court was not persuaded that the judge applied the wrong test in his application of s. 21(1)(c)(i) of the FOIPOP Act to the issues before him nor that he made a palpable or overriding error of fact. 

 

 

 

 

This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.  The full court judgment consists of 4 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.