Citation: R. v. Starratt, 2007 NSCA 21
Date: 20070214
Docket: CAC 269727
Registry: Halifax
Between:
Joseph R. Starratt
Appellant
v.
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Judge: The Honourable Justice M. Jill Hamilton
Appeal Heard: January 22, 2007
Subject: Criminal law, procedure to be followed when judge does not accept joint recommendation of counsel for penalty for breach of conditional sentence
Summary: The appellant admitted that he breached his conditional sentence by committing the offence of driving while under the influence in a location he was not authorized to be. Counsel made a joint recommendation that the penalty imposed for the breach be time served, which was 5 days at that time. Without indicating to counsel that she had a concern with the joint recommendation and giving them an opportunity to make further submissions, the judge terminated the conditional sentence.
Issue: Did the judge err in terminating the conditional sentence?
Result: The judge erred by not indicating to the parties her concern with their joint recommendation and giving them an opportunity to make further submissions. Appeal allowed and penalty varied to time served after counsel were given the opportunity to make the arguments they would have made to the judge if given the opportunity to do so.
This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment. Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet. The full court judgment consists of 10 pages. |