Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

CASE NO.                                                   VOL. NO.                                                           PAGE

                                                                             

Her Majesty The Queen                                - and -                                    Bernard Edgar Moore

(Appellant)                                                                                                                       (Respondent)

                                                                             

                                                                             

CAC No. 182118                                       Halifax, N.S.                                    HAMILTON, J.A.

                                               [Cite as: R. v. Moore, 2002 NSCA151]

 

APPEAL HEARD:                             November 27, 2002   

 

JUDGMENT DELIVERED:            November 27, 2002

 

 

SUBJECT:                 Criminal Code s.253(b) - right to Counsel - exclusion of evidence- s.10(b) and s.24(2) of the Charter

 

SUMMARY:              The respondent was convicted in Provincial Court, where the results of his breathalyser tests were admitted, of operating a motor vehicle while having consumed alcohol such that the concentration of alcohol in his blood exceeded the .08 limit prescribed by s.253(b) of the Criminal Code. On summary conviction appeal, the judge reversed the conviction, ruling that the respondent’s  s.10(b) rights were violated when the police failed to include a reference to the availability of legal aid when they purported to read him his charter rights relating to his right to counsel. The summary conviction appeal court judge also excluded the results of the breathalyser pursuant to s.24(2) of the Charter.

 

ISSUES:                      Were the respondent’s  s.10(b) Charter rights violated, and if so, should the results of the breathalyser tests be included or excluded from the evidence?

 

RESULT:                    Appeal dismissed. The summary conviction appeal court judge did not err in finding the respondent’s  s.10(b) Charter rights were violated and in determining that the evidence should be excluded, applying the tests set out in R. v Collins, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 265.

 

 

 

 

This information sheet does not form part of the court’s decision.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.  The full court judgment consists of 2 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.