Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

Nova Scotia Court of Appeal

Citation: Jeffrie v. Hendriksen, 2015 NSCA 49

Date: 20150520

Docket: CA 414372

Registry: Halifax

Between:

Roderick Jeffrie

Appellant

v.

Anthony Hendriksen, Inland Marine Services Limited and Three Ports Fisheries Limited

Respondents

 

Judge:

The Honourable Justice Peter M.S. Bryson

Appeal Heard:

February 10, 2015, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

Subject:

Contract formation; Oral contracts; Corporations: oppressive conduct;

Summary:

Jeffrie and Hendriksen were equal shareholders in Three Ports Fisheries Limited.  The application judge found that Hendriksen agreed to buy out Jeffrie.  But he also found that the agreement was unenforceable because it was not in writing and negotiations between the parties assumed any agreement would only be binding if drafted by legal counsel.  He dismissed Jefffrie’s action for breach of contract and oppression under the Third Schedule of the Companies Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 81.  Jeffrie appealed.

Issues:

(1)        Did the oral agreement between the parties constitute a binding and enforceable contract?

(2)        Was Hendriksen’s conduct oppressive?

Result:

Appeal allowed.  Parties entered into an enforceable oral agreement.  The judge erred by finding an agreement had been reached on the basis of the parties’ conduct “objectively viewed” but then finding it was not binding based on the same legal test.  He also erred in not conducting a contextual analysis, including the genesis and purpose of negotiations and other material factors which established that the oral agreement was binding.  The judge’s finding that no oppressive circumstances were made out was upheld.

This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment. Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet. The full court judgment consists of 20 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.