Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

                           NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

Citation: Shannex Health Care Management Inc. v.

Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2005 NSCA 158

 

Date: Decision Date 20051208

Docket: 228257

Registry: Halifax

 

 

Between:

Shannex Health Care Management Inc.

Applicant/Appellant

v.

 

Attorney General of Nova Scotia representing

the Nova Scotia Department of Health

Respondent

 

                                                             

                                                             

 

 

 

 

 

Judge:                   The Honourable Justice Nancy Bateman

 

Application Heard:         November 18, 2005

 

Subject:       Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.S. 1993, c. 5 (“FOIPOP Act”)/Order for Confidentiality       

 


Summary:   FOIPOP Review Officer ordered release of certain Department of Health approved budget summaries relating to Shannex’s operation of nursing homes in the Province.  Shannex appealed to the Supreme Court, tendering affidavit evidence demonstrating that from the budget summaries information about the nursing home’s actual operations could be gleaned.  The Supreme Court judge dismissed the appeal, finding that Shannex had not demonstrated that the release of the records would “harm significantly” its competitive position (FOIPOP Act, s. 21(1)(c)).  A Supreme Court judge had ordered the affidavit evidence sealed.  Appeal from Supreme Court dismissed.  After appeal hearing Shannex applied to the Court of Appeal to seal both the affidavit evidence and the records in dispute.

 

Issues:         Should the affidavits and/or records in dispute be sealed?   

 

Result:        The order sought by Shannex conflicts with the open court principle.  While the Court has a discretion to grant a sealing order, that discretion must be exercised through the application of the Dagenais/Mentuck test (Sierra Club of Canada v. Canada (Minister of Finance), [2002] 2 S.C.R. 522, 2002 SCC 41).

 

Shannex met the burden of demonstrating that the order sought, which was in the interests of protecting the fair trial process, outweighed the negative effect the order would have on the principle of open justice.

 

Partial confidentiality order granted in relation to the affidavit evidence  as well as a full sealing order in relation to the record in dispute.

 

 

 

 

This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.  The full court judgment consists of 13 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.