Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

       Citation: Scott Slipp Nissan Ltd. v. Dartmouth Dodge Chrysler (1991) Inc.,

                                                    2003 NSCA 98

 

                                                                                                     Date: 20030924

                                                                                                     Docket: 190874

                                                                                                   Registry:  Halifax

 

 

Between:

                                           Scott Slipp Nissan Limited

                                                                                                               Appellant

                                                             v.

 

                               Dartmouth Dodge Chrysler (1991) Inc. and

                                    Adesa Auctions Canada Corporation

 

                                                                                                          Respondents

 

 

Judges:                           Cromwell, Oland and Hamilton, JJ.A.

 

Appeal Heard:                September 24, 2003, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Written Judgment:         September 24, 2003

 

Held:                    Application for leave to appeal dismissed per oral reasons for judgment of Cromwell, J.A.; Oland and Hamilton, JJ.A. concurring.

 

Counsel:                         Walter Newton, Q.C. and Bill Watts, for the appellant

Charles Ford, for the respondent Dartmouth Dodge Chrysler (1991) Inc.

Colin D. Piercey, for the respondent Adesa Auctions Canada Corporation

 


Reasons for judgment:

 

[1]              Scott Slipp Nissan Limited (“Slipp”) applies for leave to appeal a costs order made by Stewart, J. after trial.

 

[2]              In light of the clear findings of fact by the trial judge, we are of the view that this appeal does not raise a fairly arguable point.  The application for leave to appeal is therefore dismissed.         

 

[3]              The appellant shall pay to each of the respondents costs fixed at $750 inclusive of disbursements.                  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                             Cromwell, J.A.

Concurred in:

Oland, J.A.

Hamilton, J.A.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.