Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

                           NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

Citation: CIBC Wood Gundy Financial Services v. Blackman,

2007 NSCA 98

 

Date: 20071017

Docket: CA 281133

Registry: Halifax

 

 

Between:

CIBC Wood Gundy Financial Services and

CIBC World Markets Inc.

 

Appellants

v.

 

                                           Richard George Blackman

 

                                                                                                            Respondent

                                                          - and -

 

                                           Merrill Lynch Canada Inc.

 

                                                                                                              Intervenor

 

 

 

Judge:                   The Honourable Justice Thomas Cromwell

 

Appeal Heard:      October 5, 2007

 

Subject:                 Production of documents - res judicata - semblance of relevance                    

 

Summary:             The defendants resisted the plaintiff’s  application for production of a document on two bases: first, that production had been denied in an earlier application so that the matter was res judicata or governed by issue estoppel and, second, that in any event, the document did not meet the semblance of relevance threshold for production.  The chambers judge ordered production and the defendants appealed.


 

Issues:                   1.       Was the application for production barred by the earlier order?

2.       If not, did the document meet the semblance of relevance threshold? 

 

Result:                  Leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed.  The chambers judge had a discretion under Rule 20.10 to revisit the issue of whether the document should be produced and he did not err in the circumstances of this case in exercising that discretion in the plaintiff’s favour.  The document met the semblance of relevance threshold and the judge did not err in ordering it to be produced.

 

 

 

 

This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.  The full court judgment consists of 7 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.