Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date:19980326                                                                                            Docket:  C.A.144161

                                                                                                                                                                

 

                                              NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

                            Cite as: Nova Scotia (Finance) v. Hodder, 1998 NSCA 86

                                             Chipman, Freeman and Flinn, JJ.A.

 

IN THE MATTER OF:

The complaint of Wilson Hodder against the Nova Scotia

Department of Finance and the Nova Scotia Teachers Union

(N.S.H.R.C. Case No. 3.3.95) under the Human Rights Act,

R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 214, as amended

 

BETWEEN:

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN in the right        )         Karin McCaskill

of the PROVINCE OF NOVA SCOTIA                       )          for the Appellant

represented by the MINISTER OF FINANCE  )           Minister of Finance

)

Appellant         )       

)

- and -                                                 )

)        B. Lynn Reierson,

WILSON HODDER,  NOVA SCOTIA HUMAN          )        A. Wayne MacKay,

RIGHTS COMMISSION and PATRICK J.                   )        Valerie A. MacKenzie

DUNCAN, Q.C., a Board of Inquiry appointed           )          for the Respondents

pursuant to Section 32A(1) of the Human                  )

Rights Act                                                                      )                                                                                                Respondent                    )                  Appeal Heard:

)           March 26, 1998

)

)

)        Judgment Delivered:

)           March 26, 1998

)

)

)

)

 

THE COURT:     Appeal dismissed per oral reasons of Chipman, J.A.; Freeman and Flinn, JJ.A. concurring.


CHIPMAN, J.A.: (Orally)

This is an appeal from a decision of a Board of Inquiry appointed under the Human Rights Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 214, as amended, resolving preliminary motions relating to its jurisdiction.

 

For the reasons given by this Court in Workers Compensation Board (N.S.) v. OQuinn (1995), 147 N.S.R. (2d) 28, we are of the opinion that the administration by the appellant of the pension and other benefits at issue is capable of being considered the provision of services or facilities within the meaning of s. 5(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act.  The Board of Inquiry therefore has jurisdiction to proceed with the inqury into the complaint before it.  It is not necessary, at this stage, to address the other issues raised before us and we express no opinion on them.

 

The appeal is dismissed without costs.

 

Chipman, J.A.

Concurred in:

Freeman, J.A.

Flinn, J.A.


                                                                                                   C.A. 144161

 

                                                     NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

 

BETWEEN:

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN in the      )

right of the PROVINCE OF NOVA                     )

SCOTIA represented by the                                  )

MINISTER OF FINANCE                                      )           REASONS FOR

)           JUDGMENT BY:

Appellant                       )

)

- and -                                                   )           CHIPMAN, J.A.

)              (Orally)

WILSON HODDER, the NOVA                           )

SCOTIA HUMAN RIGHTS                                   )

COMMISSION and PATRICK J.                         )

DUNCAN, Q.C., a Board of Inquiry                     )

appointed pursuant to Section 32A(1)   )

of the Human Rights Act                                       )

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.