Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

CASE NO.                                                  VOLUME                                                          PAGE

 

Cite as: Blagdon v. Blagdon, 1998 NSCA 82

 

LLOYD BLAGDON                                                                                    HELEN G. BLAGDON

                                                                         - and -

(Appellant)                                                                                                                  (Respondent)

 

C.A.  No.  144018                                    Halifax, N.S.                                                FLINN, J.A.

                                                                                                                               (orally)

 

 

 

APPEAL HEARD:                                        March 18, 1998

 

JUDGMENT DELIVERED:              March 18, 1998

 

WRITTEN RELEASE OF ORAL:                March 20, 1998

 

 

 

SUBJECT:           Matrimonial Property Act - Division of Matrimonial Assets

 

SUMMARY:         This appeal arises out of an application by the appellant husband for an unequal division in his favor of matrimonial assets.  The respondent wife had requested an equal division.  The marriage was of relatively short duration (2 years and 10 months) following a period of cohabitation of 14 months.  The husband had brought, substantially, all of the assets into the marriage.  The value of the matrimonial assets at the time of separation was $138,125.00 plus the value of certain furniture.  The trial judge ordered the husband to pay the wife $15,000.00 and to assume matrimonial debts of $22,000.00.  The husband was ordered to pay suit money and costs.

 

ISSUE:                 Appellate review.

 

RESULT:  Husband’s appeal dismissed.  The ruling of the trial judge was not clearly excessive, in the wife’s favor, nor was it inequitable to the husband, as was the case in Roberts v. Shotten (1997), 156 N.S.R. (2d) 47.  The Court of Appeal would not interfere with the decision of the trial judge.

 

 

 


 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION, QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT FROM THE COVER SHEET.  THE FULL COURT DECISION CONSISTS OF 2 PAGES.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.