Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 19971117                                                        Docket No. CA 137001

 

 

 

                                              NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

 

                                      Cite as: Cameron v. George, 1997 NSCA 183

                                         Chipman, Freeman and Cromwell, JJ.A.

 

 

 

 

BETWEEN:                                                                          )

)

JOHN CAMERON                                                                )           John R. Ratchford

)           for the Appellant

Appellant                    )

)

- and -                                                                                    )

)

JUSTIN T. GEORGE and MARGARET                              )           Robert M. Purdy, Q.C.

CONNOLLY and CO-OPERATORS GENERAL  )           for the Respondents

INSURANCE COMPANY                                                    )

)

Respondents )

)

)

)           Appeal Heard:

)           November 17, 1997

)

)

)           Judgment Delivered:

)           November 17, 1997

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE COURT:           The appeal is dismissed with costs as per oral reasons for judgment of Chipman, J.A.; Freeman and Cromwell, JJ.A., concurring.

 

 

 

 

 


The reasons for judgment of the Court were delivered orally by:

CHIPMAN, J.A.:

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a decision of Justice Scanlan in Supreme Court making a determination that the third party Co-operators General Insurance Company was not liable to indemnify the defendant Justin George for any amounts he may become liable to pay the plaintiff, and dismissing the plaintiff’s action against the defendant Margaret Connolly.

The issue before the trial judge, as far as concerns this Court, was whether Justin George had Connolly’s consent, express or implied, to drive her motor vehicle at the time of the collision giving rise to the plaintiff’s injuries.

We are of the opinion that in the result it has not been shown that the trial judge made any palpable or overriding error in his assessment of the evidence leading to the conclusion that Connolly did not consent to the operation of her motor vehicle by George at the relevant time.

The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondents, one bill, in the amount of 40% of the costs of the trial, plus disbursements to be taxed.

 

 

Chipman, J.A.

Concurred in:

Freeman, J.A.

 

Cromwell, J.A.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.