Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

Citation: Nova Scotia (Assessment) v.

Artificial Reef Society of Nova Scotia, 2007 NSCA 67

 

Date: 20070531

Docket: CA 273952

Registry: Halifax

 

 

Between:

 

Director of Assessment and

Town of Bridgewater

Appellant

v.

 

The Artificial Reef Society of Nova Scotia

Respondent

 

 

 

 

 

Judges:                 Bateman, Cromwell & Saunders, JJ.A.

 

Appeal Heard:      May 31, 2007, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Held:           Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed, as per oral reasons for judgment of Saunders, J.A.; Bateman & Cromwell, JJ.A. concurring

 

Counsel:               Mark V. Rieksts, for the appellant & respondent on cross-appeal

David J. Demirkan, for the respondent & appellant by cross-    appeal


Reasons for judgment:

 

 

[1]              We will not disturb a judge’s discretionary award of costs unless wrong principles of law have been applied, or the decision is so clearly wrong as to amount to a manifest injustice.

 

[2]              Neither cause for intervention arises here.

 

[3]              We are not persuaded that the proposed fresh evidence sought to be introduced by the appellant is relevant to the matters before us this morning.  We, therefore, decline to receive the impugned correspondence.

 

[4]              While leave to both appeal and cross-appeal is granted, each is denied.

 

[5]              For its success in defeating the main appeal, we award the respondent its costs of $5,000.00 plus disbursements, as taxed or agreed, for its attendance today.  There will be no costs on the cross-appeal.

 

 

 

 

Saunders, J.A.

 

 

 

Concurred in:

 

Bateman, J.A.

 

Cromwell, J.A.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.