Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

Nova Scotia Court of Appeal

Citation: R. v. Melvin, 2016 NSCA 52

Date: 20160609

Docket: CAC 439892

Registry: Halifax

Between:

Cory Patrick Melvin

Appellant

v.

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

 

Judge:

The Honourable Justice David P.S. Farrar

Appeal Heard:

March 22, 2016, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

Subject:

Criminal Law. Jury Charge on Aggravated Assault and Possession of a Weapon for the Purpose of Committing an Offence. Duty to Review and Relate the Evidence to the Issues.

Summary:

In the early morning hours of August 16, 2011, an altercation occurred in downtown Halifax which resulted in an individual being cut with a knife.  There were a number of altercations occurring within the same general area over a 10 to 15 minute period.  Mr. Melvin was charged with aggravated assault on the victim, and assault with a weapon on two other individuals and possession of a weapon for the purpose of committing an offence.  He was convicted of aggravated assault and possession of a weapon for the purpose of committing an offence. He was found not guilty on the remaining charges.  At trial, the issue was whether the appellant was the individual who stabbed the victim.  On appeal, the appellant claimed that the trial judge had failed to properly charge the jury.

Issues:

Did the trial judge fulfil his duty to properly charge the jury and, in particular, did he fail to relate the evidence to the issues that the jury had to decide?

 

Result:

The trial judge in his main charge, and in response to a question from the jury, failed to adequately relate the evidence to the issues the jury had to decide and the key issue before it, that is, whether Mr. Melvin was the individual who stabbed the victim.  The appeal is allowed and a new trial ordered.

This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment. Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet. The full court judgment consists of 14 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.