Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

CASE NO.                                     VOL. NO.                                            PAGE

 

C. D. C.                                                          - and -                  HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                                                                                                           

(Appellant)                                                                                                                (Respondent)

 

                                                                             

CAC169841                                             Halifax, N.S.                                       Saunders, J.A.

                                                                                                                                                           

                                            [Cite as: R v. C.D.C., 2001 NSCA 175 ]

 

 

                                           Editorial Notice

 

Identifying information has been removed from this electronic version of the library sheet.

 

 

APPEAL HEARD:                                 November 29, 2001

 

JUDGMENT DELIVERED:                 December 3, 2001

 

 

SUBJECT:         Fresh Evidence. Incompetent Counsel, Miscarriage of Justice. Unreasonable Verdict.

 

SUMMARY:        Appellant appealed his conviction for sexual assault arguing that the trial judge misapprehended the evidence and that the verdict was inconsistent and unreasonable. He sought leave to adduce fresh evidence in the form of hospital records alleging that his ineffective trial counsel missed an opportunity to cross-examine the attending physician or the complainant concerning inconsistencies between the complainants testimony and that which was recorded by hospital staff, thereby denying him the constitutional right to make full answer and defence.

 

ISSUE:                 1.  Whether leave ought to be granted to adduce fresh evidence;

2.   Whether the appellants trial counsel was incompetent and, if so, whether her ineffectiveness prejudiced the appellants trial;

3.   Whether the trial judge misapprehended the evidence resulting in a miscarriage of justice;

4.   Whether the verdict was inconsistent and unreasonable.

 

 


RESULT:            Application for leave to introduce fresh evidence denied and appeal dismissed.

 

 

        This information sheet does not form part of the courts judgment.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.  The full court judgment consists of 6 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.