Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                         C.A.C.  No.  134065

 

 

                                              NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

                                              Cite as: R. v. Brewer, 1997 NSCA 95

 

                                                Freeman, Hart and Bateman, JJ.A.

 

BETWEEN:

 

DARRYL JAMES BREWER                                        )                                                                                                                               )           Darryl James Brewer

)          appeared in person

Appellant         )

)

- and -                                                 )

)        Kenneth W.F. Fiske, Q.C.

)        Jean M. Whalen

)          for the Respondent

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN                                      )                                                                                                                               )

)

Respondent         )        Appeal Heard:

)           March 25, 1997

)

)

)        Judgment Delivered:

)           April 14, 1997

)

 

 

 

 

THE COURT:     Leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed per reasons for judgment of Freeman, J.A.; Hart and Bateman, JJ.A. concurring.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FREEMAN, J.A.:

 


The appellant, 28, was apprehended after robbing two stores and a taxi-driver for money to buy crack cocaine;  on his release from custody awaiting trial he robbed another taxi driver for the same purpose.  By word and gesture he informed his victims he was armed, although he appears not to have been.

He has applied for leave to appeal sentences totalling six years for the four robberies and a charge of driving one of the taxis while disqualified on grounds that the sentences are excessive.

The sentencing judge took certain mitigating factors into account and in my view the sentences are lenient.   This court's benchmark sentence for a robbery in this category is three years. Applying the totality principle to four such robberies,  six years is neither "manifestly excessive" nor  "clearly unreasonable"--see R. v. Shropshire (1996), 188 N.R. 284 (S.C.C.).   The appellant has failed to provide a basis on which his sentences could be considered to be unfit.   Leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed.

 

Freeman, J.A.

Concurred in:

Hart, J.A.

Bateman, J.A.     

 

 

 

 

                                                     C.A.C. No.134065

                                                                                     

 

                 NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

 

                                          

BETWEEN:

 

DARRYL JAMES BREWER

)

Appellant           )

- and -                                                         )       REASONS                                                             FOR


)                                                     JUDGMENT BY:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN                        )                                        

)       FREEMAN,

)         J.A.

Respondent       )

)

)

)

)

)

)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.