Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

CASE NO.                                                     VOL. NO.                                           PAGE

 

Cite as: R. v. Chute, 1997 NSCA 134

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN                     - and -                                        MICHAEL CHUTE

 

Appellant                                                                                Respondent

 

C.A.C. No. 135355                                       Halifax                                    ROSCOE, J.A.

 

APPEAL HEARD:                                       June 16, 1997

 

JUDGMENT DELIVERED:                       July 2, 1997

 

SUBJECT:                           Fisheries Act, Fishery (General) Regulations

 

SUMMARY:                          The respondent was convicted in Provincial Court of failing to permit an observer to go on board his fishing vessel. A summary conviction appeal to the Supreme Court was allowed.

 

ISSUES:                                1.         Whether s. 46 of the Regulations provided the Regional Director-General with the authority to require in one letter that herring fishers arrange for observers for all fishing trips in the winter fishing season.

 

2.         Whether the Regional Director-General had improperly delegated his authority to a private company which supplied the observers.

 

RESULT:                              Appeal from Summary Conviction Appeal Court allowed. The trial judge had not erred in finding that the observer program was within the authority of the Regulations and that there was no improper delegation by the Regional Director-General.

 

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT”S DECISION. QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT FROM THE COVER SHEET. THE FULL COURT DECISION CONSISTS OF 13 PAGES.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.