Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 19990112                                                                                            Docket:  CA 146551

 

 

                                             NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

Cite as: Nova Scotia (Workers= Compensation Board) v. Reashore, 1999 NSCA 23

 

                                           Chipman, Freeman and Roscoe, JJ.A.

 

 

 

BETWEEN:                                                                                      )

)

WORKERS= COMPENSATION BOARD                                     )           John R. Ratchford

OF NOVA SCOTIA                                                                          )           for the Appellant

)

Appellant                   )

)

- and -                                                                                                )

)

WORKERS= COMPENSATION APPEALS                                 )           Respondents not

TRIBUNAL OF NOVA SCOTIA and                                             )           appearing

CLAYTON REASHORE                                                                 )          

)

Respondents            )

)

)

)           Appeal Heard:

)           January 12, 1999

)

)

)

)           Judgment Delivered:

)           January 12, 1999

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE COURT:           The appeal is dismissed without costs as per oral reasons for judgment of Chipman, J.A.; Freeman and Roscoe, JJ.A., concurring.

 


 

The reasons for judgment of the Court were delivered orally by:

CHIPMAN, J.A.:

This is an appeal by the Workers= Compensation Board from a decision of the Workers= Compensation Appeals Tribunal pursuant to s. 256 of the Workers= Compensation Act, 1994-95, c. 10.

The appellant must show that the point raised is a question as to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal.  An appeal lies on no other question of law or fact.

The Tribunal allowed an appeal from a decision of the Board that the claimant was not unfit for work.  The appeal was allowed on the basis that the Board failed to consider medical evidence.

The appellant has not shown that the Tribunal made any jurisdictional error that was material to the result reached.  Accordingly, it is not necessary to review further the reasoning of the Tribunal.

The appeal is dismissed without costs.

 

 

 

 

Chipman, J.A.

Concurred in:

Freeman, J.A.

 

Roscoe, J.A.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.