NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL
Citation: R. v. Adams, 2010 NSCA 42
Date: 20100513
Docket: CAC 313056
Registry: Halifax
Between:
Her Majesty the Queen
Appellant
v.
Peter Frederick Adams
Respondent
Judge: The Honourable Justice Nancy Bateman
Appeal Heard: April 1, 2010
Subject: Crown appeal from sentence for break, enter and theft; possession of stolen goods and counselling perjury.
Summary: After many days of trial, the offender, a businessman with a high income, pleaded guilty to two counts of break, enter and theft; one count of counselling perjury; and eight counts of possession of stolen property. The value of the goods involved totalled about $690,000. The goods possessed could be tracked to thefts taking place over about a three year period. The offender was sentenced to 42 months incarceration plus finds of $82,000 and community service and probation. After 2/1 remand credit he would serve an additional 7 months incarceration. The Crown appealed alleging the sentence manifestly unfit.
Issue: Was the sentence within the range taking into account the circumstances of the offences, those of the offender and the principle of totality?
Result: Appeal allowed. Sentence manifestly unfit. Sentence, larger fines and community service vacated. Global sentence of 96 months before remand credit imposed effective the date of original sentencing. Re-incarceration of offender unavoidable in view of the need to denounce and deter such crimes. The application of totality discussed in some detail.
This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment. Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet. The full court judgment consists of 32 pages. |