Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

                           NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

Citation: Nova Scotia (Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal)

v. Peach, 2011 NSCA 27

 

Date: 20110304

Docket: CA 327470

Registry: Halifax

 

 

Between:

Nova Scotia (Department of Transportation

and Infrastructure Renewal)

Appellant

v.

 

Nora T. Peach

Respondent

                                                   

 

 

Judge:                   The Honourable Justice Linda Lee Oland

 

Appeal Heard:      January 20, 2011

 

Subject:                 Solicitor-Client Privilege - Waiver - Freedom of Information and Protection of Property Act, S.N.S. 1993, c. 5, s. 16 (FOIPOP)

 

Summary:             The respondent inquired as to the legal status of a road.  An area manager of the appellant sent her an e-mail which referred to a legal opinion obtained from a government lawyer and summarized its reasons.  The respondent’s request for access to the opinion was denied on the basis of the exemption for information subject to solicitor-client privilege contained in s. 16 of FOIPOP.  The judge found that the opinion was subject to such privilege and that it had been impliedly waived by a person who had authority to do so.   The appellant appeals his order for full disclosure of the legal opinion. 

 


Issues:                   Whether a civil servant may waive solicitor-client privilege that would otherwise attach to confidential legal advice received from a government lawyer.  Whether the area manager’s e-mail waived the privilege.

 

Result:                  Appeal dismissed.  In deciding that solicitor-client privilege could be waived other than by an order-in-council by the Executive Council, the judge made no error that would attract appellate intervention.  The framework he suggested to determine when a government actor can do so is consistent with the principle of distributed governmental authority.  The judge made no palpable and overriding errors in finding that the author of the e-mail had authority to waive privilege, he evinced an intention to waive, and the entire opinion letter should be disclosed. 

 

 

 

 

This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.  The full court judgment consists of 16 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.