Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 19971201                                                                    Docket No. CA 139600

 

 

 

                                              NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

                         Cite as: White v. 2438162 Nova Scotia Ltd., 1997 NSCA 187

 

                                           Chipman, Freeman and Roscoe, JJ.A.

 

 

 

BETWEEN:                                                                          )

)

WADE WHITE                                                                       )           Appellant appeared

)           in person

Appellant        )

)

- and -                                                                                    )

)

2438612 NOVA SCOTIA LIMITED                         )           Linda Grab

)           for the Respondent

Respondent   )

)

)

)

)           Appeal Heard:

)           December 1, 1997

)

)

)

)           Judgment Delivered:

)           December 1, 1997

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE COURT:           The appeal is dismissed without costs as per oral reasons for judgment of Chipman, J.A.; Freeman and Roscoe, JJ.A., concurring.

 

 

 

 


The reasons for judgment of the Court were delivered orally by:

CHIPMAN, J.A.:

This is an appeal by Wade White from an order of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia confirming the report of the Residential Tenancies Board dated June 9, 1997.  That report recommended to the Court, inter alia, that Mr. White be required to vacate the premises rented by him from the respondent 2438612 Nova Scotia Limited.

The appellant complains that the time requirements in the Residential Tenancies Act with respect to notice of the landlord’s complaint and the date of the hearing were not complied with.  We are not satisfied that the Board erred in finding that the Act was complied with.  Other irregularities claimed by the appellant’s have not been shown to be errors of law.

Having heard the submissions of the appellant and the respondent, and considering the provisions of the Residential Tenancies Act, we are satisfied that the Board reached the correct result and, accordingly, that the Supreme Court judge committed no error in confirming the recommendation of the Residential Tenancies Board.  The appeal is dismissed, without costs.

 

 

Chipman, J.A.

 

Concurred in:

Freeman, J.A.

Roscoe, J.A.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.