Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

CASE NO.                                         VOL. NO.                                           PAGE

Cite as: Big Pond Publishing and Production Ltd. v. Macumber, 1998 NSCA 157

 

BIG POND PUBLISHING                 - and -                        ALAN R. MACUMBER

AND PRODUCTION LIMITED

 

Appellant                                                                    Respondent

 

C.A. No. 144267                                           Halifax                        CHIPMAN, J.A.

 

APPEAL HEARD:                                       September 17, 1998

 

JUDGMENT DELIVERED:                       September 17, 1998

 

WRITTEN RELEASE OF ORAL:             September 22, 1998

 

SUBJECT:               CONTRACTS - Commercial arrangement whereby musician performed in concerts - Termination

 

SUMMARY:              This is an appeal from a decision of Hamilton, J. finding that there was a wrongful termination by the appellant of a continuing commercial relationship between the parties whereby the respondent would perform as a musician for the appellant in performance.  She found that the appellant terminated this relationship without notice, whereas in the circumstances reasonable notice would be 90 days, resulting in a damage award of $19,890.00 to the respondent.  The damages were calculated on the basis of the amount earned by another musician who performed for the appellant during the 90 days following the termination.

 

ISSUE:                      Whether the trial judge erred in finding a commercial relationship, its termination, or in fixing the requisite period of notice of termination.

 

RESULT:                  The Court of Appeal held that it had not been shown that the trial judge erred in finding a commercial arrangement or that it was terminated, but that she had erred in fixing the period of notice.  The Court of Appeal, based on the evidence, substituted a period of 60 days notice for 90 days as fixed by the trial judge.

 

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT’S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT FROM THIS COVER SHEET.  THE FULL COURT DECISION CONSISTS OF 2 PAGES.

 


 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.