Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                               C.A.  No.  129315

 

 

                                        NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

                       Cite as: Nova Scotia (Provincial Tax Commission) v.

                                   Canadian Salt Co. Ltd., 1996 NSCA 231

 

                                           Freeman, Hart and Pugsley, JJ.A.

 

BETWEEN:

 

THE HEALTH SERVICES TAX ACT,                        )

R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 190, as amended                           )        Duncan R. Beveridge

)          for the Appellant

)         

Appellant         )

)

- and -                                                 )

)        Leanne M. Rodwell-Hayes

)          for the Respondent

An Appeal of the Canadian Salt                                  )

Company Limited of Assessment                               )

#61471 and proceeding bearing                                 )

No. NSURB-TX-96-05                                        )                                                                

)

Respondent         )        Appeal Heard:

)           December 2, 1996

)

)

)        Judgment Delivered:

)           December 2, 1996

)

 

 

 

THE COURT:     Appeal allowed with costs at $1000.00 plus disbursements per oral reasons for judgment of Freeman, J.A.; Hart and Pugsley, JJ.A. concurring.

 

 

 

                                                                       

 

 

 

 

 

The reasons for judgment of the Court were delivered orally by:

FREEMAN, J.A.:


This is an appeal from a decision of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board finding fans used in the ventilation system of the appellant's salt mine in Pugwash, N.S. to be exempt from taxation under the Health Services Tax Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 198, but which did not include the electricity used in the operation of the fans within the exemption.

The fans were found exempt under s. 12(1)(o) of the Act which provides:

12(1)  The following classes of tangible personal property are specifically exempted from the provisions of this Act:

 

(o)  tangible personal property purchased by manufacturers, producers or processors of goods, or such other persons engaged in other commercial activities as are designated by the Minister, for use by them in the detection, measurement, prevention, treatment, reduction, removal, disposal or carrying away of pollutants to water, soil or air.

 

Electricity is defined as tangible  personal  property under s. 2(t)(ii) of the Act.

The failure by the Board to include electricity in the exemption may have been an oversight; there is no justification for not including it.

The Board's order merely states that the Order of the Provincial Tax Commissioner is varied, presumably in accordance with the Board's decision.

The appeal is allowed with costs.

The Board's decision is varied to include electricity used to operate the fans which are found exempt under s. 12(1)(o).  It is not necessary to consider the  further basis for exemption found by the Board under s. 12(1)(m) and s. 12(1)(n).

Costs are fixed at $1000.00 plus disbursements.

 

Freeman, J.A.


Concurred in:

Hart, J.A.

Pugsley, J.A.


                                                                    C.A. No.129315

                                                                                                

 

                      NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

 

                                               

BETWEEN:

 

THE HEALTH SERVICES TAX ACT

R.S.N.S. 1989, C. 1989 as amended

)

Appellant           )

- and -                                                         )       REASONS FOR

)       JUDGMENT BY:

An appeal of the Canadian Salt                     )

Company Limited of Assessment #61471       )

and proceeding bearing No. NSURB-TX-         )

96-05                                                          )

)       FREEMAN,

)         J.A.

Respondent       )

)

)

)

)

)

)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.