Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

C.A. No. 02926

 

 

                                                                                                                  NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

                                                                           Cite as: A.K.W. Homes Ltd. v. County Realty Ltd., 1995 NSCA 9

 

                                                                                                               Chipman, Roscoe and Pugsley, JJ.A.

 

 

 

 

BETWEEN:                                                                                                                                                                                             )

)

A. K. W. HOMES LIMITED                                                                                                        )                      Hugh R. McLeod

)                      for the Appellant

Appellant                                                )

)

- and -                                                                                                                                                                                                        )

)

COUNTY REALTY LIMITED                                                                                                      )                      Michael S. Ryan, Q.C.

)                      for the Respondent

Respondent                                          )

)

)

)                      Appeal Heard:

)                      February 3, 1995

)

)

)                      Judgment Delivered:

)                      February 3, 1995

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE COURT:               The appeal is dismissed as per oral reasons for judgment of Chipman, J.A.; Roscoe and Pugsley, JJ.A., concurring.

 

 

 

 

 

The reasons for judgment of the Court were delivered orally by

 

CHIPMAN, J.A.:


This is an appeal from a decision in the Supreme Court fixing amounts owed by the appellant and the respondent to one another respectively arising out of business dealings between them over a number of years.  The amount found owing to the respondent exceeded that owing to the appellant, resulting in a net judgment in the respondent's favour.

We have considered the record, the written submissions of counsel and the oral argument presented to us today.

In our view, the trial judge made no palpable or overriding error in his findings of fact or in the application of the law.

The appeal is dismissed with costs which are fixed at 40% of the trial costs, plus disbursements to be taxed.

 

 

 

Chipman, J.A.

 

Concurred in:

Roscoe, J.A.

 

Pugsley, J.A.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.