Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Pawlus v. Pawlus

Court Court of Appeal
Date 1998-10-05
Citation 1998 NSCA 166
Docket CA 146235
Judge/Registrar/Adjudicator Roscoe, Elizabeth A. (Honourable Justice) (CA); Chipman, David (Honourable Justice); Flinn, Edward J. (Honourable Justice)
Document Type Library Sheet
Relations Decision - Pawlus v. Pawlus - 1998 NSCA 166 - 1998-10-05 - Decision

Decision Content

CASE NO.                                                                                                                       VOL. NO.                                                                                                PAGE

Cite as: Pawlus v. Pawlus, 1998 NSCA 166

 

JANUSZ PAWLUS                                                                             - and -                                TERESA PAWLUS

 

Appellant                                                                                                                                                                                                Respondent

 

C.A. No. 146235                                                                              Halifax                                                      ROSCOE, J.A.

 

APPEAL HEARD:                                                                             October 5, 1998

 

JUDGMENT DELIVERED:                               October 5, 1998

 

WRITTEN RELEASE OF ORAL:                                             October 7, 1998

 

SUBJECT:                                                                                                                       Family Law -  Divorce

 

SUMMARY:                                                                In a Corollary Relief Judgment, the trial judge granted detailed specified access, including weekday access upon prior notice, and ordered a total amount of child support for two children in the amount of $725.11, in accordance with the guidelines.

 

ISSUE:                                                       Whether the Supreme Court justice erred.

 

RESULT:                                                  Appeal dismissed.  No error of law by Supreme Court justice.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT’S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT FROM THIS COVER SHEET.  THE FULL COURT DECISION CONSISTS OF TWO PAGES.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.