Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Peck v. Peck

Court Court of Appeal
Date 2000-10-11
Citation 2000 NSCA 114
Docket CA 151724
Judge/Registrar/Adjudicator Bateman, Nancy J. (Honourable Justice) (CA); Flinn, Edward J. (Honourable Justice); Roscoe, Elizabeth A. (Honourable Justice) (CA)
Document Type Library Sheet
Relations Decision - Peck v. Peck - 2000 NSCA 114 - 2000-10-11 - Decision

Decision Content

CASE NO.                                                  VOL. NO.                                                          PAGE

 

DEBORAH PECK                                                                                                  TRACY PECK

                                                                        - and -

(Appellant)                                                                                                                (Respondent)

 

CA 151724                                               Halifax, N.S.                                       BATEMAN, J.A.

 

                                                                                                                                                           

                                          Cite as: Peck v. Peck, 2000 NSCA 114]

 

APPEAL HEARD:                                       October 2nd, 2000

 

JUDGMENT DELIVERED:                       October 11, 2000

 

SUBJECT:               Custody/care and control.

 

 

 

SUMMARY:              Trial judge ordered that day to day care and control of the three children of the marriage be with the father.  Mother appealed.

 

 

ISSUES:                    Did the trial judge err in so ordering?

 

 

RESULT:                  Appeal dismissed.  The trial judge’s conclusion that it was in the children’s best interests to reside with the father is supported by the evidentiary record.  (Fact specific)

 

 

 

This information sheet does not form part of the court’s decision.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.  The full court judgment consists of 12 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.