CASE NO. VOLUME PAGE
Cite as: Roberts v. Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Appeals Tribunal), 1998 NSCA 27
LINDA ROBERTS, Workers' Compensation Claimant (Claim No. 5023150)
(Appellant)
- and -
THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL OF NOVA SCOTIA
and THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD OF NOVA SCOTIA
(Respondents)
C.A. No. 136291 Halifax, N.S. Clarke, C.J.N.S.
APPEAL HEARD: February 4, 1998
JUDGMENT DELIVERED: February 4, 1998
SUBJECT: Workers' Compensation - Entitlement to Permanent Partial Disability Benefits.
Administrative Law - Standard of Review on Appeals from the Workers' Compensation Appeals Tribunal to the Court of Appeal.
Workers' Compensation Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 508 (the former Act).
Workers' Compensation Act, S.N.S. 1994-95, c. 10, s. 228 (the current Act).
Workers' Compensation Transitional Appeal Regulations.
SUMMARY: On June 11, 1990, the appellant, a fish trimmer, was injured. Pursuant to the former Workers' Compensation Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 508, she was awarded temporary total disability benefits at various times during 1991 and 1992. Her benefits were terminated in 1992. Effective February 1, 1996, the current Workers' Compensation Act, S.N.S. 1994-95, c. 10, was proclaimed. The Workers' Compensation Transitional Appeal Regulations were put in place. The former Act was repealed. The appellant sought permanent partial disability benefits under s. 45 of the former Act.
On appeal from a decision of the Hearing Officer, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Tribunal, on February 14, 1997, denied the appellant's claim. The appellant appealed the decision of the Tribunal to the Court of Appeal.
ISSUE: Did the Tribunal err.
RESULT: The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal. It concluded the decision of the Court in Doward v. Workers' Compensation Board (N.S.) (1997), 160 N.S.R. (2d), determined the result of the appeal. The injury and the claim fell within the transitional "window period" between March 23, 1990 and February 1, 1996.
The interpretation of s. 228 of the current Act by the Court in Doward applies resulting in the conclusion that the Tribunal made a jurisdictional error.
The Court ordered the matter remitted to the Tribunal to decide whether the appellant is entitled to permanent partial disability benefits under the provisions of s. 228 of the current Act, applying the law as stated by this Court in Doward.
The Court referred to Chipman, J.A. in Doward at p. 42 (paras. 113, 114), p. 43 (para. 118), p. 44 (para. 124), p. 47 (para. 137), p. 48 (para. 142), p. 44 (para. 124), and p. 31 (paras. 46 and 47).
This information sheet does not form part of the Court's decision. Quotes must be from the decision, not this cover sheet. The full court decision consists of 8 pages.
|