Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

CASE NO.                                                  VOLUME                                                          PAGE

Cite as: Susin v. Delazzer, 1997 NSCA 190

 

JOHN SUSIN                                                                            JOE DELAZZER O/A JOE DEL

                                                                        - and -

(Appellant)                                                                                                                (Respondent)

 

C.A.  No.  140214                                Halifax, N.S.                                         HALLETT, J.A.

                                                                                                                                        

 

 

 

APPEAL HEARD:                                        November 25, 1997

 

JUDGMENT DELIVERED:             December 9, 1997

 

SUBJECT:           Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act, S.N.S. 1973, c. 13, s. 1

Interest on Judgments Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 233

 

SUMMARY:        Appeal from an Order, granted under the Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act, for registration of a judgment of the Mississauga Small Claims Court of Ontario.

 

The judgment creditor (the appellant) asserts that the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia did not have jurisdiction to vary the pre-judgment and post-judgment interest rate of 28.8% awarded by the Ontario Court.

 

Appeal is allowed in part.  The Supreme Court did not have jurisdiction to vary the pre-judgment interest rate (Ruttan v. Ruttan, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 690) but the Court did not err in reducing the post-judgment interest rate to 5% from the date of registration of the judgment in Nova Scotia.

 

The Appeal Court ordered that the appellant give notice to the respondent judgment debtor of the order granted by the Appeal Court as provided for in s. 7 of the Act.

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION, QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT FROM THE COVER SHEET.  THE FULL COURT DECISION CONSISTS OF 17 PAGES.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.