Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

                                 Citation: R. v. Mason, 2003 NSCA 139

 

                                                                                                     Date: 20031209

                                                                                             Docket: CAC 200571

                                                                                                   Registry:  Halifax

 

 

Between:

                                                 Ian Wallace Mason

                                                                                                               Appellant

                                                             v.

 

                                              Her Majesty the Queen

                                                                                                            Respondent

 

 

                                                                                                                            

                                                                                                                            

 

Judge:                            Glube, C.J.N.S. and Fichaud, J.A.

 

Appeal Heard:                November 19, 2003                  

 

Subject:                 Adjournment of criminal trial. Argument of new issues on appeal.

 

Summary:        The Crown requested an adjournment because a witness was unavailable. The Provincial Court denied the adjournment and dismissed the charge. The Summary Conviction Appeal Court allowed the appeal.

 

 

Held:                The adjournment was appropriate. The appellant could ot assert s. 11 (b) of the Charter for the first time on the appeal.

 

 

 

 

 

This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.  The full court judgment consists of 6  pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.