Citation: Gillis v. MacKeigan, 2010 NSCA 101
Date: 20101210
Docket: CA 328060
Registry: Halifax
Between:
John Lloyd Gillis
Appellant
v.
David MacKeigan, Jr.
Respondent
Judge: The Honourable Justice David P.S. Farrar
Appeal Heard: November 10, 2010
Subject: Insurance Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 231; Automobile Insurance Tort Recovery Limitation - What Constitutes a “Minor Injury”
Summary: The appellant appeals from a determination that the injury he suffered in a motor vehicle accident was a “minor injury” within the meaning of the Insurance Act.
Issue: Whether the trial judge properly interpreted the provisions of the Insurance Act in determining the appellant suffered a “minor injury”.
Result: The trial judge erred in his interpretation of the provisions of the Insurance Act and Regulations. The matter was remitted to the trial judge for an assessment of damages taking into consideration the proper interpretation of the Insurance Act and Regulations.
This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment. Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet. The full court judgment consists of 8 pages. |