Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

                            Citation: Theriault v. Theriault, 2003 NSCA 90

 

                                                                                                     Date: 20030909

                                                                                             Docket: C.A. 188385

                                                                                                   Registry:  Halifax

 

 

Between:

                                              Marjorie Ella Theriault

                                                                                                               Appellant

                                                             v.

 

                                               Walter Ross Theriault

                                                                                                            Respondent

 

 

 

Judge(s):                        Glube, C.J.N.S.; Saunders and Oland, JJ.A.

 

Appeal Heard:                September 9, 2003, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Written Judgment:         September 10, 2003

 

Held:                              Appeal is allowed without costs, per oral reasons for judgment of Glube, C.J.N.S.; Saunders and Oland, JJ.A. concurring.

 

Counsel:                         Andrew S. Nickerson, Q.C. for the appellant

Donald Fraser, for the respondent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                            

 


Reasons for judgment:

 

[1]              Based upon the evidence presented at trial, we see no reversible error in the manner in which the trial judge disposed of this case, except for a minor omission, namely, providing a final date for disposing of the fishing businesses.

 

[2]              In light of the fact that the respondent’s date of birth is July 20, 1941, and his evidence “that he would like to continue as a fisherman until age 65", we would amend the corollary relief judgment by deleting s. 2(b) and substituting the following:

 

2(b) The respondent shall sell the assets of the said fishing businesses on or before December 31, 2006, and upon such sale shall pay to the petitioner 30% of the net proceeds of the sale.

 

[3]              In all other respects, the corollary relief judgment is confirmed.

 

[4]              The appeal is allowed without costs.

 

 

 

 

Glube, C.J.N.S.

 

Concurred in:

 

Saunders, J.A.

 

Oland, J.A.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.