Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

Citation: Municipal Contracting Ltd. v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2003 NSCA 10

 

                                                                                               Docket: CA 179154

                                                                                                   Registry:  Halifax

 

Between:

 

                               Municipal Contracting Limited, as agent for

                             and on behalf of Municipal Enterprises Limited

                                                             

                                                                                                               Appellant

                                                             v.

                                                             

                                   The Attorney General of Nova Scotia,

                            representing Her Majesty the Queen in Right of

                                          the Province of Nova Scotia

                                                                                                            Respondent

 

 

                                                                                                                            

                                                             

JUDGE:                Glube, C.J.N.S., with Bateman, J.A. concurring by separate reasons.     

 

APPEAL HEARD:                        October 10, 2002

 

JUDGMENT DELIVERED:          January 22, 2003

 

SUBJECT:          STATUTORY INTERPRETATION

 

SUMMARY:    A rock quarrying and crushing company claimed a refund of taxes paid over a number of years pursuant to the Gasoline and Diesel Oil Tax Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 183 and its Regulations.  Refund refused.              

 

 


                                                           - 2 -

 

ISSUE:             How to interpret the words in a regulation, namely, “to the extent and in the manner determined by these Regulations” when no additional regulation was ever passed.

 

RESULT:         The phrase makes the meaning of “production or processing” ambiguous and an absurdity.  Review of law on interpreting a taxing statute including absurdity, ambiguity, legislative intent and use of legislative history.

 

No entitlement to a refund.  Appeal dismissed.

 

 

This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.  The full court judgment consists of 34 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.