Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

CASE NO.                                                  VOLUME                                                          PAGE

Cite as: R. v. M.D., 1998 NSCA 47

 

M. D.                                                                                           HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN

                                                                                                     RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF

                                                                                                                                 NOVA SCOTIA

                                                                         - and -

(Appellant)                                                                                                                  (Respondent)

 

C.A.  No.  141637                                    Halifax, N.S.                                                FLINN, J.A.

                                                                                                                               (orally)

 

 

 

APPEAL HEARD:                                        January 9, 1998

 

JUDGMENT DELIVERED:              January 9, 1998

 

WRITTEN RELEASE OF ORAL:

 

 

 

SUBJECT:           Appeal from certiorari order of Supreme Court Judge

 

SUMMARY:         On a certiorari application, a Supreme Court Judge quashed an order, as to costs, issued by a Provincial Court Judge against the Crown.  The order had been granted by the Provincial Court Judge, as a Charter remedy, on the basis of abuse of prosecutorial discretion.  It was granted following an application heard immediately after the appellant was acquitted.

 

The Supreme Court Judge quashed the order because:

 

1.         Defence counsel had not given appropriate notice of his intention to seek a Charter remedy so as to enable the Crown to call evidence as to how it exercised its prosecutorial discretion.

 

2.         The Provincial Court Judge refused to allow the Crown to call evidence, and decided the issue on the basis of the evidence which was presented at the trial.

 

3.         The decision of the Provincial Court Judge was without jurisdiction because that decision was rendered without evidence of the improper exercise of prosecutorial discretion, and without a finding by the trial judge of the essential ingredients of abuse of discretion.


 

RESULT:  Appeal dismissed.  The Supreme Court Judge made no reviewable error in quashing the order, as to costs, issued by the Provincial Court Judge.

 

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION, QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT FROM THE COVER SHEET.  THE FULL COURT DECISION CONSISTS OF 2 PAGES.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.