Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

                           NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

Citation: Dutkewych v. Riske, 2007 NSCA 8

 

Date: 20070125

Docket:  CA 270296

Registry: Halifax

 

 

Between:

Andreas Myroslav Dutkewych

Appellant

v.

 

Patricia Riske

                                                                                                            Respondent

 

 

 

 

Judge:                   The Honourable Justice Nancy Bateman

 

Appeal Heard:      January 25, 2007

 

Written Reasons: January 26, 2007

 

Subject:                Setting aside a default judgment           

 

Summary:        Parties’ settlement agreement on separation incorporated into California divorce judgment in 2000.  Former wife sued former husband in Nova Scotia alleging default under the provisions of the agreement.  Default judgment entered quantifying monetary effect of alleged default.  Proposed defence was that former husband had partially satisfied terms of settlement agreement.  The Chambers judge was satisfied applicant had a reasonable excuse for failing to defend on time but dismissed the application, citing Beals v. Saldanha, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 416, on the basis that the applicant did not have a fairly arguable defence in view of the “foreign judgment”.     

 

Issue:               Did the judge err in concluding the former husband did not have a fairly arguable defence to the action?


 

 

Result:             Appeal allowed with costs.  The question of whether, or to what extent, the former husband is in default of the terms of the separation agreement is a serious issue to be tried.

 

 

 

This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.  The full court judgment consists of 3 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.