NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL
Citation: R.B. v. Children’s Aid Society of Halifax, 2003 NSCA 49
Docket: CA 194141
Registry: Halifax
Between:
R.B.
Appellant
v.
Children’s Aid Society of Halifax
and S.F.
Respondents
JUDGE: CHIPMAN, J.A.
JUDGMENT DELIVERED: May 1, 2003
SUBJECT: Family Law
Children and Family Services Act, S.N.S. 1990, c. 5
SUMMARY: The appellant had brought an application in the Supreme Court (Family Division) as grandmother of a child placed in the permanent care of the respondent Agency for party status and leave for the purpose of making an application to terminate the order for permanent care. It was agreed between the parties that this application and the issue whether she had shown a change in circumstances as contemplated by s. 48(10)(a) of the Act would be heard and the question of the child’s best interests as contemplated by s. 48(10)(b) of the Act be determined later if necessary. The trial judge granted the application for party standing and leave but dismissed the application on the merits holding that the appellant had failed to demonstrate a change of circumstances. The appellant appealed and the respondent Agency cross-appealed the order granting party status and leave.
ISSUE: Whether the learned trial judge erred as alleged in the appeal and cross-appeal.
RESULT: The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal reviewed the circumstances and determined that the trial judge had erred in granting party status and leave here where the appellant had failed to show compelling circumstances justifying such an order. The cross-appeal was therefore allowed and as a result the appeal was deemed moot. No order was made as to costs.
This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment. Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet. The full court judgment consists of 12 pages. |