Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

Citation: Sheetharbour Offshore Development Inc. v. Tusket Mining Inc.,

2007 NSCA 59

 

                                                                                                     Date: 20070511

                                                                                              Docket:  CA 258749

                                                                                                    Registry: Halifax

 

Between:

 

Tusket Mining Incorporated, a body corporate

                                                                         Appellant

                                                             v.

 

Sheetharbour Offshore Development Inc.,

a body corporate

                                                                                                            Respondent

 

 

Judge:                   The Honourable Justice Jamie W. S. Saunders

 

Appeal Heard:      May 11, 2007       

 

Subject:                 Interlocutory injunction. Real property.  Specific performance.  Statute of Frauds, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 442.  Serious question.  Irreparable harm.  Balance of convenience.  Standard of review.

 

Summary:             The appellant owns lands at Sheet Harbour, N.S.  A Chambers judge, on application by the respondent, had enjoined the appellant from selling a 100 acre parcel to a third party.  In its law suit the respondent claims damages and specific performance of an agreement of purchase and sale, coupled with execution and delivery of a deed conveying title to the 100 acres.

 

The appellant appealed, asking that the Chambers judge’s decision be reversed and the injunction lifted.

 

 

 


Held:           Appeal dismissed.  The Chambers judge carefully assessed the evidence, conducted a proper but necessarily extremely limited review of the case on the merits, and applied the law correctly in answering all three branches of the test in RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311.  None of his findings, or inferences drawn from those findings, were the result of palpable and overriding error.  Housen v. Nikolaisen, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235.

 

 

 

 

This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.  The full court judgment consists of 4 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.