Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                                                                                   S.C.C.  No.  02773

 

 

                                                                                                     NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

 

                                                                                                     Cite as: R. v. Tracz, 1993 NSCA 150

 

                                                                                                       Matthews, Hart and Pugsley, JJ.A.

 

BETWEEN:

 

CHRISTOPHER R. TRACZ                                                                                               )                                                                                                                                  Kim E. Richardson

)                  for the Appellant

Appellant      )

)

- and -                                                                                                         )

)                William D. Delaney

)                  for the Respondent

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN                                                                                          )                                                         

Respondent         )                   Appeal Heard:

)                   May 20, 1993

)

)

)                Judgment Delivered:

)                   May 20, 1993

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 

 

 

THE COURT:   Appeal dismissed per oral reasons for judgment of Matthews, J.A.; Hart and Pugsley, JJ.A. concurring.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The reasons for judgment of the Court were delivered orally by:

MATTHEWS, J.A.:


This is an appeal from the verdict of a jury convicting the appellant on a charge of arson.

There are three grounds of appeal:

"1.  The learned trial judge erred in refusing the appellant's application for directed verdict of not guilty at the close of the Crown's case.

 

2.  The learned trial judge misdirected the jury in his charge by stating that there was more than circumstantial evidence implicating the appellant in the offence.

 

3.  The juries verdict was unreasonable and unsupported by the evidence resulting in a miscarriage of justice."

 

We have considered these grounds, read all of the material filed and in particular the trial judge's charge to the jury and heard the submissions of appellant's counsel.  In our unanimous opinion there is no merit in this appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

 

 

J.A.

Concurred in:

Hart, J.A.

Pugsley, J.A.

 

 

                                                                                                                                                      S.C.C. No. 02773

                                                                                                                                                                                                

 

                                                             NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

 

                                                                                                

BETWEEN:

 


CHRISTOPHER R. TRACZ

)

Appellant                             )

- and -                                                                                                                        )              REASONS FOR

)              JUDGMENT BY:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN     )                                                                                                          

)              MATTHEWS,

)                J.A.

Respondent                        )

)

)

)

)

)

)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.