Family Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

                                      IN THE FAMILY COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                                            Citation: C.H.T. v. C.L.M., 2008 NSFC 13

                                                                                                                                   Date:20080423

                                                                                                                           Docket: 06D048998

    Registry: Yarmouth

Between:

                                                                         C.H.T.

                                                                                                                                              Applicant

                                                                             v.

 

                                                               C.L.M. and J.M.M.

      Respondent

 

                                                         LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:             The Honourable John D. Comeau, Chief Judge of the Family Court for the

Province of Nova Scotia

 

Heard:                        Digby, Nova Scotia

February 26, 2008

March 4, 2008

April 1, 2008

 

Counsel:                     Anita Hudak Esq. For the Applicant

Sharon L. Cochrane Esq. For the Respondent C.L.M.

Peter Van Feggelen Esq. For the Respondent J.M.M.

 

Decision Date:           April 23, 2008

 

Issue  :                       Custody - Application to Vary

 

Summary:                   The Applicant is the father of the child T., born July *, 2000. (editorial note- removed to protect identity) The Respondent is the maternal grandmother and J.M.M. is the mother , who agrees her mother retain custody. On March 4, 2008, the Court by consent granted custody to the maternal grandmother ( guardian under the MCA). At the time, she lived in Digby County near the father, but moved to Kings County for various reasons, including what she described as harassment /threats from the father. The childs mother was unable to care for the child and she agreed to her mother having custody. The father had never continuously parented the child, who was over 7 years old and his wife would end up being a mother substitute. The father was illiterate and the child was an academic achiever, doing very well in school in Kings County.

 


 

 

 

Result:                      Custody granted to the maternal grandmother with unsupervised reasonable access to the mother. Reasonable access upon reasonable notice to the father, taking into account there is now a schedule of access. The move of the grandmother to Kings County from Digby County is a material change in circumstances, but the father did not discharge the onus on him to prove that as a result, the prior order no longer reflects the childs best interest.

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.