Family Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

                                       IN THE FAMILY COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                                                 Citation: K.C. v. J.L.,  NSFC 29

                                                                                                                               Date: 20101115

                                                                                               Docket: 10Y070134 & 08Y061231

                                                                                                                        Registry:  Yarmouth

 

Between:                                                        K.C.

                                                                                                       Applicant/Respondent

                                                                             v.

 

                                                                           J.L

                                                                                                                      Respondent/Applicant

 

                                      AND IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICANT

                                                                          D.T.

                                           for leave to apply for custody/access

 

                                                                           and

 

                                                                   J.L and K.C.                              

 

                                                         LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:                       The Honourable John D. COMEAU

Judge of the Family Court of Nova Scotia

 

Heard:                       Heard at Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, October20, 2010

 

Written Decision:   November 15, 2010 

 

Issue:                        Mobility - Child Custody and Access

                                Grandparent leave - Custody Access

 

Summary:                The mother of the child applied to the court for permission to move                               to Saskatchewan with the parties only child.  The father refused to                                    consent to the move and asked for joint custody and primary care                                       with reasonable access to the mother with a permanent order that                                    neither party can remove the child from the jurisdiction of the court                                     without the consent of the other

The paternal grandmother applied for leave to have the court                             consider custody and or access to her.  She was also opposed to                                    the mothers proposed move to Saskatchewan.

 

 


Result:                      The Court refused permission for the mother to move to                                     Saskatchewan.  It would interfere with the fathers access and he                                 has a very close bond with the child.

 

The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on Gordon vs. Gortz                             was considered and it was determined the mothers plan to                                      substitute one extended family for another was contrary to the                                childs best interest.  There was no established bond with the                               mothers father and extended family in Saskatchewan.  She wanted                             to go to Saskatchewan to get work but hand not obtained                                       employment nor has he investigated employment in Nova Scotia.                                                  (the local area).  Her mother with whom she resides lives here in                              the local area and was willing to provide a home for her and the                                     child.

 

The paternal grandmother was granted leave and access.  She had                             a very close and strong bond with the child since birth.  She was an                                 exceptional help to the parents who at times continued to show                                        their immaturity in their actions and relationships.  Both them and                                  the child continues to need her guidance and assistance.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.