Family Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

                                      IN THE FAMILY COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                                             Citation: C.N.K. v. A.E.A., 2011 NSFC 9

                                                                                                                                  Date: 20110420

                                                                                                                         Docket: 07SB052469

                                                                                                                           Registry:  Yarmouth

 

Between:

                                                                        C.N.K.

                                                                                                                                              Applicant

                                                                             v.

 

                                                                         A.E.A.

                                                                                                                                          Respondent

 

                                                         LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

 

Judge:             The Honourable John D. COMEAU

Judge of the Family Court of Nova Scotia

 

Heard:                        Digby, Nova Scotia, March 29, 2011

 

Decision Date:           April 20, 2011

 

Counsel:                     Applicant - unrepresented

Respondent - Oliver Janson, Esq.

 

Issue:                                    Change in circumstances/custody/access/child support

 

 

Summary:                   The mother and father of two children had a shared parenting agreement                                    that worked well until the father questioned the mother's parenting ability                              in front of the oldest child. The oldest child got in an argument with her                          mother and went to her father's. The mother left her there indicating                                     persons she was not to associate with. This was not adhered to by the                           father. The child's A mark dropped to a C in the new school she attended                                       in the father's area. There was lack of discipline at the father's with the                                 child being on the internet (she had a facebook page) all hours of the                                     night. There was evidence of the father's drug use and anger problems.

 

 

 

 


Result:                        Shared parenting was no longer an option as the parties could not                                  communicate or get along. Sole custody was granted to the mother with                                     specified access to the father. The older child was to be returned to the                                           mother's care within a specified time unless she directed otherwise, taking                           into account schooling.

The mother believes part of the reason for continuous litigation was the                          father resented paying child support. She agreed she did not want any child                             support.                       

The father's obligation to pay was terminated.

 

.          

 

 

 

. THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.