Family Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

                                       IN THE FAMILY COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                                              Citation: B.A.  v. A,A,., 2009 NSFC 11

 

                                                                                                                                  Date: 20090430

                                                                                                                            Docket: 06D047977

                                                                                                                          Registry:  Yarmouth

 

Between:

                                                                          B.A..

                                                                                                                                             Applicant

                                                                             v.

 

                                                                          A.A.

                                                                                                                                          Respondent

 

                                                                LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

                                                Editorial Notice

 

Identifying information has been removed from this electronic version of the library sheet.

 

Judge:                         The Honourable John D. COMEAU

Chief Judge of the Family Court of Nova Scotia

 

Heard:                        Heard at Digby, Nova Scotia, March 10, 2009

at Annapolis Royal, N.S., March 19, 2009

 

Written Decision:       April 30, 2009            

 

Issue:                                                         Custody/Access

 

Summary:                                              This is an application brought by the mother under the Maintenance and                                                                        Custody Act for the sole custody of two children. The father asked for                                                                                           50/50 split custody.  Custody assessment report recommended  if the                                                          father could not agree, mother (who had always been the primary                                                                    caregiver) should have sole custody with regular reasonable access                                                                 (already having a schedule) to the father.  The usual allegations of                                                    improper parenting was made by both sides with the father opposing sole                                                                        custody, I dont want her to have all the say.

 

Result:             The Court orders sole custody to the mother but clarified what this meant                           by adding conditions for cooperation and disclosure between the parents.                                              Custody was awarded because of the fathers mobility to Edmonton to                                    work.  Access was to remain as set out in an earlier court order.

 

 


 

 

. THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.