Family Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

 

                                                                          IN THE FAMILY COURT FOR THE PROVINCE OF NOVA SCOTIA

                                                                                                 [Cite as: Abudulai v. Abudulai, 2003 NSFC 13]

 

 

BETWEEN:

                                                                                                                                       Evelyn Abudulai

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        APPLICANT

                                                                                                                                                    - and -

 

                                                                                                                                Muhammed Abudulai

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   RESPONDENT

 

Judge Corrine Sparks                                                                          Kentville, Nova Scotia                                                                                   FKMCA-016775

 

                                                                                                                   LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

HEARD:                               March 21 and May 9, 2003

 

DECISION DATE:            June 23, 2003

 

SUBJECT:                            Variation of child support under S. 37 of the Maintenance and Custody Act, for three children - two of whom are adult, university students.

 

SUMMARY:                                                Variation granted; however, university expenses were not apportioned between the parties.  Court examined, in detail, the means and conditions of the parties and the two adult children.

 

ISSUE(S):                            Should there be a retroactive variation of child support?

 

Should current and past university expenses be apportioned between the parties?

 

RESULT:                              Variation granted with respondent father ordered to pay 50% of outstanding university fees for one adult child, and ordered to pay 60% of university expenses beyond loans and bursaries for another adult child.  No retroactive variation granted.

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT FROM THIS COVER SHEET.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.