Provincial Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

PROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: R. v. Thomas, 2012 NSPC 107

 

Date: November 13, 2012

Docket: 2518579, 2518580, 2513440

2513441, 2513443, 2513445

Registry: Pictou

 

 

Between:

Her Majesty the Queen

 

v.

 

Clayton Anthony Thomas

 

 

 

 

Judge:                           The Honourable Judge Del W. Atwood

 

Heard:                           November 13, 2012, in Pictou, Nova Scotia

 

Charge:                         Section 733.1 (3 counts) 266CC, 264.1(1)(b)CC, 279(2)CC

 

Counsel:                        William Gorman, for the Nova Scotia Public Prosecution Service

                             Douglas Lloy, Nova Scotia Legal Aid, for the Clayton Anthony Thomas

 


ORALLY:

[1]             The Court has for sentencing Clayton Anthony Thomas.  Mr. Thomas has entered guilty pleas at a very early opportunity in relation to charges from this judicial centre, from the 15th to the 17th of September, 2012, as well as matters transferred in from the Sydney judicial centre arising from the 11th of October of 2012.

[2]             The Court is satisfied that the joint submission takes into account the principles of sentencing.  It is consistent with sentences imposed in this judicial centre, including R. v. Dean 2011 NSPC 40, and the Court intends to give effect to the joint submission; therefore, the sentence of the Court will be as follows:

[3]             In relation to case #2513440, a count of section 266CC, there will be a sentence of four (4)-months’ imprisonment, and that will be the base sentence.

[4]             Case #2513441, a charge of uttering threats, there will be a sentence of four (4)-months’ imprisonment, to be served consecutively.

[5]             Case #2513443, a charge of unlawful confinement, a four (4)-month consecutive sentence.

[6]             Case #2513445, a charge of breach of probation, a four (4)-month consecutive sentence.

[7]             Case #2518579, a charge of breach of probation, a four (4)-month consecutive sentence.

[8]             Finally, case #2518580,  a charge of breach of probation, a four (4)-month-plus-one-(1) day  consecutive sentence, for a total of twenty-four (24) months plus one (1) day imprisonment, which I believe gives effect to the joint submission.

[9]             In addition, although not sought, I believe it is in the interests of justice and necessary for the protection and safety of the victim that the warrant of committal be endorsed in accordance with the provisions of section 743.21 of the Criminal Code.  Mr. Thomas is to have no contact or communication, either directly or indirectly, with Kayla Jane Elizabeth Earle.

[10]        Mr. Thomas, I’ll have you accompany the sheriffs please, sir.

 

                                                          ______________________________

                                                                                                          J.P.C.         

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.