Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

                          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

             Citation:  Horne v. Capital District Health Authority, 2005 NSSC 41

 

                                                                                                    Date:  20050223

                                                                                     Docket:   S.H. No. 214181

                                                                                                   Registry:  Halifax

Between:

                                                 Dr Gabrielle Horne

                                                                                                               Applicant

                                                             v.

     Capital District Health Authority and Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre

                                                                                                            Respondent

 

                                                         LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge: The Honourable Justice Donald M. Hall

 

Heard:            September 8, 2004 in Halifax

 

Subject:           Variation of medical staff privileges       

 

Summary:       Certain privileges of the applicant who is a cardiologist and research scientist employed by the Capital Health District Authority were suspended because of conflicts in the cardiology department concerning the applicant triggering a "privileges review".  In order to resolve the issues the CEO of the hospital and the applicant engaged in a mediation process which resulted in a settlement whereby the applicant was reinstated subject to conditions.  Subsequently the hospital administration refused to acknowledge the settlement saying that it was not bound because the CEO did not have authority to enter into such an agreement on behalf of Capital Health.  The applicant maintained that it was a binding agreement and initiated this application for judicial review and to enforce the agreement.

 

Issue:                        Was Capital Health bound by the agreement.

 

Result:          Capital Health was not bound.  The CEO had neither actual nor ostensible authority to enter into the settlement on behalf of Capital Health.  Capital Health does not have power to delegate such authority respecting medical staff privileges.

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.