Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: Potter v. Courtney , 2005NSSC174

 

Date: 050622

Docket: S.H. 235231

Registry: Halifax

Between:

 

Dan Potter

Plaintiff

v.

 

Raymond Courtney, Tim Hill, Navigator Technologies Inc.,

and Burchell MacDougall

Defendants

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge: The Honourable Justice Suzanne M. Hood

 

Heard:            April 20, 2005 in Halifax, Nova Scotia

(Written decision June 22, 2005)

 

Subject:        Striking of pleadings: C.P.R. 14.25; summary judgment for defendants: C.P.R. 13.

 

Summary:        Tim Hill is counsel for Raymond Courtney and Navigator Technologies Inc. in what is referred to as the Knowledge House action.  A separate action was commenced by Dan Potter, the Chair and CEO of Knowledge House Inc., against Raymond Courtney, Navigator Technologies Inc., Tim Hill and his firm, Burchell MacDougall, for the tort of civil conspiracy. 

 

Tim Hill and Burchell MacDougall apply to strike the pleadings against them pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 14.25 or, alternatively, to grant them summary judgment pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 13.

 

Issue:              1.   Should the pleadings be struck? or

2.   Should summary judgment be granted to the defendants, Tim Hill and Burchell MacDougall?

 

Result:            Claim is not frivolous or vexatious or an abuse of the court’s process.  It focuses                        on the act of providing the email documents not their contents.  Material facts                        are in dispute so there is no basis for summary judgment.                                          

 

 

 

            THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.            QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.