Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF Nova Scotia

FAMILY DIVISION

Citation: Armoyan v. Armoyan, 2015 NSSC 191

Date: 2015-07-03

Docket: Halifax No. 1201-65036

Registry: Halifax

Between:

Lisa Armoyan

Applicant

v.

Vrege Armoyan

Respondent

 

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:

The Honourable Justice Theresa M. Forgeron

 

Heard:

February 26, 2015 and May 8, 2015 in Halifax, Nova Scotia

Decision:

 

Subject:

 

Issue:

 

Result:

July 3, 2015

 

Family Law

 

Abuse of Process

 

  Decisions rendered by other courts in other proceedings were relevant to abuse of process determination in the MPA proceeding. It is illogical to view each decision in isolation because each ruling involved the same family and issues arising from their separation and divorce.

  The husband continuously refused to comply with court orders; his refusals were not grounded on an inability to pay.

  Courts have reprimanded, reproached and rebuked the husband for his dishonorable and shameful litigation conduct. There have been countless stern warnings and sharp rebukes. None of these censures brought about compliance.

  This exceptional and rare remedy must be invoked because of the husband’s misuse of the court’s process and procedures. The abuses have proven to be manifestly unfair to the wife; the misconduct was so tainted that it has brought the administration of justice into disrepute. The integrity of the court’s adjudicative functions was compromised. The husband’s conduct violated principles of fundamental justice underlying the community’s sense of fair play; public confidence in the legal process was thus undermined.

  Abuse of process motion granted given the husband’ egregious litigation misconduct. The husband’s MPA pleadings were struck; application to proceed on the wife’s pleadings and evidence. The husband may apply to the court to have order vacated once he has complied with all court orders.

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET

 

 

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.