Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

                                     IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                                          Citation: Porteous v. Hurley, 2005 NSSC 229

 

                                                                                                                                  Date: 20050816

                                                                                                                        Docket: SAM 190783

                                                                                                                               Registry: Amherst

 

Between:

                                                                 Richard Porteous

                                                                                                                                                 Plaintiff

                                                                             v.

 

                                                 Daniel A. Hurley and Norma J. Hurley

                                                                                                                                           Defendants

 

 

                                                         LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:             The Honourable Justice Charles E. Haliburton                          

Heard:                        June 14 - 16, 2005, in Amherst, Nova Scotia

 

Written Decision:       August 16, 2005                                              

 

Subject:                       Action for Trespass to Real Property; location of boundary line in                                    dispute           

 

Summary:                   Present occupants of two wood lots found conflicting evidence of established boundary.  Crown Grant lines not established.  Suggestion of conventional line dismissed.  Evidence of occupation of one discreet area by predecessor of Defendants.  Evidence of sale of land implicitly recognizing boundary line of Defendants by predecessor of Plaintiff. 

 

Result:                      Plaintiffs action in trespass dismissed.

 

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.    QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.