Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

                         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

     Citation: Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada, 2004 NSSC 15

                                                                             

                                                                                                                                  Date: 20040110

                                                                                                                          Docket: S.H. 149142

                                                                                                                                Registry:  Halifax

Between:

                                       The Attorney General of Nova Scotia, Representing

                              Her Majesty The Queen in Right of the Province of Nova Scotia

 

                                                                                                                                                 Plaintiff

                                                                             v.

 

Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada, Guardian Insurance Company

of Canada, The Halifax Insurance Company, Wellington Insurance Company,

General Accident Assurance Company of Canada and Quebec Assurance Company

 

                                                                                                                                           Defendants

 

 

                                                            LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:           The Honourable Justice Gerald R. P. Moir

 

Heard:           18 December 2003

 

Subject:        Pretrial Procedure, Disclosure and Production of Documents

 

Summary:    Province sued to recover from insurers payments made to those who claimed to have been abused at provincial institutions as children.  After making the payments under an ADR programme, the Province set up a programme to compensate some employees who may have been wrongly accused.  Insurers sought production of Employee Compensation Programme documents.

 

Issue:              Whether relevant on a preliminary assessment?

 

Result:            Disclosure ordered.  It is arguable that the Province made admissions that some allegations did not give rise to liability.  Documentation of possible admissions and of the entire context has a semblance of relevancy.  More narrowly, some of the documentation may go to establish reasonableness of some settlements, which may go to the Province’s claim of breach of duty to defend.

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.