Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                            SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                         Citation: Burrell v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2004 NSSC 249

                                                                                                                                      Date: 041126

                                                                                                                           Docket: SN 105675

                                                                                                                                Registry: Sydney

Between:

                                                               Lawrence D. Burrell

                                                                                                                                                 Plaintiff

                                                                         - and -

 

                                      The Attorney General of the Province of Nova Scotia

                                                                                                                                              Defendant

- and -

 

2095891 Nova Scotia Limited

Defendant

LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:             The Honourable Justice Suzanne M. Hood

 

Heard:                        June 7-10, 2004,  in Sydney, Nova Scotia

 

Written Decision:       November 26, 2004

 

Subject:                       Quieting of Titles

 

Summary:                   Lawrence Burrell claims title, pursuant to the Quieting of Titles Act, to lands off Kings Road in Sydney River.  2095891 Nova Scotia Limited claims title to part of the same lands, over a part of which they have a deeded right-of-way.  The Company also disputes the granting of a certificate of title to Lawrence Burrell for the remaining lands.

 

Issue:                          1.   Should Lawrence Burrell be granted a certificate of title to the lands?

2.   Should 209859 Nova Scotia Limited be granted a right-of-way over all the lands adjacent to those over which it has a deeded right-of-way?

 

Result:                        Claim of plaintiff dismissed.  Gap in evidence of possession.  Use of one parcel was also sporadic, slight and seasonal.  Use of other parcel, over which corporate defendant had a deeded right-of-way, not sufficient to gain title by possession.

 

Possession not adverse to true owner when he was residing with person                                    through whom claim is made on lands with which subject lands said to be                                   used.

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT’S DECISION.

QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.