Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: Burns v. Sobeys Group Inc., 2007 NSSC 363

 

Date: 20071210

Docket: S.K. 217352

Registry: Kentville

 

Between:

Deborah Irene Burns

Plaintiff

v.

 

Sobeys Group Inc., a body corporate

Defendant

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:                   The Honourable Justice Gregory M. Warner

 

Heard:                  June 26, 27, 28, and July 3, 2007, at Kentville, Nova Scotia

 

 

Subject:                Employment Law; Constructive dismissal

 

Summary:             A Sobeys employee was advised by a Vice President that her position was terminated without warning at the end of a work day.  She was offered a vague, mostly undefined position in another division at the same salary, benefits and work location.  She was asked to respond by the next morning.

 


She had held several senior non-management positions and at least one low-level management position over 17½ years of employment.  She received excellent annual performance evaluations and was described as a valuable employee.  The Plaintiff was upset at the termination interview, and did not sleep well that night. Early the next morning, in an abrupt interview with the Vice President, she expressed her displeasure, said she was sick and going home, turned in her pass and asked the Vice President to have her superior or someone from personnel call her.  She did not expressly quit or resigned.  The employer assumed she had. The employer did not do contact her.  The next day a lawyer for the Plaintiff wrote the Vice President asking for a description of the position that was offered so that the Plaintiff could assess her situation.  Two weeks later the employer replied, without answering the inquiry, stating that she had resigned and offering her a small severance package.

 

Issue:          1.       Did the employee quit?

2.       If so, was she constructively dismissed?

 

Result:                  1.       The Employee did not quit.

2.       If the court is wrong and she did have the subjective intent to quit and objectively communicated it to the employer, the vague offer of alternative employment was a unilaterally-imposed fundamental change to the employment contract.  She was thus constructively dismissed.

3        16 months notice was awarded.

4        The Plaintiff did not fail to mitigate by declining to accept the employor’s offer on November 27th, while looking for other work.

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.